نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
3 استاد دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
This study plans a framework for public policy proposal. Target Population of this survey includes policy research experts, who work in policy research institutions (Secretariat of the Expediency Council, Parliamentary Commissions and ministries). Survey sampling has been selected through convenience sampling (Snowball Sampling). In order to answer these questions, what are the main elements for the appropriate public policy proposals? And which of them are more important? The paper is followed: after data gathering, some of the elements are identified and then the initial interview with sixteen experts were conducted. Other elements were extracted by using theme analysis. Finally, 21 cases were used of a total of elements were extracted and interviews, as the main elements of policy that these elements were given to thirty experts to confirm and determine the importance. Finally after the analysis of data, elements; purpose, problem identification and the executive essentials were identified as the most important elements of the proposed policy.
کلیدواژهها [English]
10. Bridgman, P. and G. Davis (2000). Australian Policy Handbook, 2edn (First Published in 1998), Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
11. Dukeshire, S. and J. Thurlow (2002). "Understanding the Link Between Research and Policy", Rural Communities Impacting Policy Project, Vol. 18.
12. Dye, Thomas R. (1995). Understanding Public Policy, Prentic-Hall, 8th Edition.
13. Galston W. A. (2006). Political Feasibility: Interests and Power; in: M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy; Oxford University Press.
14. Gorret, j and Y. Islam (1974)."Policy Research and Policy Process: Do Twain ever Meet?", Gatekeeper Series,Vol. 74.
15. Grindle, M. and J. Thomas (1990). "After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries", World Development, Vol. 18 (8).
16. Henry, G. T., and M. M. Mark (2003). "Beyond use: Understanding Evaluation's Influence on Attitudes and Action", American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 24.
17. Hovland, I. (2007). "Making a Difference: Mandd of Policy Research", Overseas Development 111 Westminster Bridge Road London, UK. Website: www.odi.org.uk.
18. Kelman, S. (1987). Making Public Policy, Basic Books, New York.
20. Lasswell, H. (1951). "The Policy Orientation", in D. Lerner and H. Lasswell (eds.) The Policy Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
21. Lindblom, Charles E. (1968).The Policy Making Process.
22. Majchrzak, A. (1984). "Technical Analysis. In Methods for Policy Research", Sage: Beverly Hills
23. McClure, C. R. and P. T. Jaeger (2008). Government Information Policy Research: Importance, Approaches, and Realities, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 30.
24. Nagel, S. and M. Feen (1978). "Policy Research Centers Directory", Urbana, IL: Policy Studies.
25. Oreszczyn S. and S. Carr (2008). "Improving the Link Between Policy Research and Practice: Usinga Senario Workshop as a Qualitative Research Tool in the Case of Genetically Modified Crops", Qualitative Research, Vol. 8.
26. Palumbo, D. J. and D. J. Calista (1990). Implementation and policy process: opening up the black box, Greenwood press Inc. USA.
27. Richard Bellman, Robert Kalaba (1965). Dynamic programming and modern control Theory, NewYork, Academic press.
28. Saunder, P. and M. Fine (1995). "Evaluation and Research In Social Policy" Social Policy Research Center, Vol. 62.
29. Scott, A. (2003). "A Review of the Links Between Research and Policy", The knowledge bridge.
30. Simons, Henry (1984). Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Staley S. R. (2006). Institutional Consideration for Sustainable Development policy Implementation: A US Case study; property Management, Vol. 24, No, 3.
32. Teune, H. and Z. Mlinar (1978). The developmental logic of social systems, Beverly Htss, ca, suge publications.
33. Weiss, C. H. (1982). "Policy research in the context of diffuse decision-making", Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 53.
34. Weiss, C. H. (1991). "Policy research as advocacy: pro and Con", Knowledge and Policy, Vol. 4 (1-2).
35. Wildavsky, Aaron (1969). "Rescuing Policy Analysis from PPBS", in Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde and Sandra J. Parkes (eds.), Classic of Public Administration 2004, Thomson.
36. Wildavsky, Aaron (1969) "Rescuing Policy Analysis from PPBS" in Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde and Sandra J. Parkes (eds.), Classic of Public Administration 2004, Thomson.
37. Wilhelm, T. (2009). "Strange Bedfellows: The Policy Consequences of Legislative Judicial Relations in the American States", American Politics Research, Vol. 37.
Zilberman, D. (1997). The value of economic research, Paper presented at the IFPRI Workshop on Measuring the Benefits of Policy-Oriented Social Science Research, April 4- 5, Washington DC.
)