مسئولیت بین المللی دولتها در برابر شرکتهای نظامی و امنیتی خصوصی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 استادیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران

3 استادیار دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

4 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران

چکیده

رشد روزافزون شرکت‌های نظامی یا امنیتی خصوصی و مشارکت آنها در مخاصمات مسلحانه داخلی و بین‌المللی موجب شده تا مسائل بسیاری درخصوص آنها مطرح شود. یکی از مهم‌ترین مسائل، تعیین مسئولیت اقدامات تخلف‌آمیز این شرکت‌هاست و اینکه چه دولتی می‌بایست مسئولیت این اقدامات را بر‌عهده گیرد. در این خصوص می‌توان دولت‌ها را به سه بخش تقسیم کرد: دولت‌های استخدام‌کننده این شرکت‌ها، دولت‌های متبوع این شرکت‌ها و دولت‌هایی که این شرکت‌ها در قلمرو آنها به فعالیت مشغول هستند. حال مسئله این است که مسئولیت اقدامات تخلف‌آمیز این شرکت‌ها با کدام دولت است؛ دولت استخدام‌کننده، دولت متبوع یا دولت محل مأموریت این شرکت‌ها. بنابراین جا دارد مسئولیت دولت‌ها روشن و مشخص شود که سهم مسئولیت دولت استخدام‌کننده، دولت متبوع و دولت محل مأموریت این شرکت‌ها در این تخلفات به چه میزان است. این نوشتار بر آن است تا با استناد به موازین و اسناد معتبر بین‌المللی، گامی درخصوص پاسخگویی به این ابهامات بردارد. خوشبختانه دراین‌باره دو سند بین‌المللی ویژه یعنی «پیش‌نویس مواد مسئولیت دولت» و «سند مونترو» وجود دارد که به‌رغم لازم‌الاجرا نبودنشان، می‌توان در این رهگذر از آنها استفاده جست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Responsibility of States and Private Military and Security Companies(PMCs)

نویسندگان [English]

  • SA H 1
  • S N 2
  • M R 3
  • fardin rostami amani 4
1 P
2 P
3 P
4 azad
چکیده [English]

International relations has been witnessing of many Non –governmental players in the arena under the name of the Private Military and Security Companies (PMCs) in the recent decades. Their ever increasing growth and participation in Internal and international armed conflict have caused many problems. One of the most important of these problems is the determination of responsibility for unlawful activities of the PMSCs and ascertaining of the responsible state in this regards. The States have been divided into three groups; the state who employ the PMSCs, the state whom the PMSCs are national of it and the state which they play role in its territory. Now the problem is which state shall be responsible for unlawful activities of the PMSCs. This essay is going to ascertain due responsible for such acts based on valid International documents and regulations. Fortunately, there are two main internationally recognized documents; the Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts ("Draft Articles") by the International Law Commission (ILC) in August 2001 and the Montreux Document which has been used by the author.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Private Military and Security Companies (PMCs)
  • Responsibility of States
  • Humanitarian Law
  • and Human Rights
  • Draft Articles
  • and the Montreux Document
1. یزدان نجات، رزا (1393). حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه و شرکت‌های خصوصی امنیتی ـ نظامی، تهران، انتشارات خرسندی.
2. نجفی، جلال‌الدین محمد (1389). »شرکت‌های امنیتی و نظامی خصوصی و حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه»، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
3. Abrisketa, Joana (2007). "Blackwater Mercenaries and International Law", University of Deusto Law Review.
4. Cameron, Lindsey (2006). "Private Military Companies: their Status under International Humanitarian Law and its Impact on their Regulation", International Review of ICRC, Vol. 88, No. 863, Review 08/09/2016 Available at: https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/irrc_863_cameron.pdf.
5. Cameron, Lindsey and Vincent Chetail (2013). Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International, Cambridge University Press.
6. Coalition Provisional Authority Memorandum Number 17, Registration Requirements for Private Security Companies (PSC), section 3, http://www.trade.gov/ static/iraq_memo17.pdf, Last seen 05/04/2016.
7. Concluding Observations of the Human Rights (2006). Committee on the Second and Third U.S. Reports to the Committee.
8. Dickinson, Laura A. (2003). "Contract as a Tool for Regulating Private Military Companies", Tulsa Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 11.
9. Dickinson, Laura T. (2006). Public Law Values in a Privatized World,George Washington University Law Schoo, Publications.
12. Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Louise Doswald-Beck (2005). "Customary International Humanitarian Law", Vol. I and II Practice Part 1, Cambridge University Press.
16. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_04_ing.pdf, Last seen 01/04/2016.
18. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/10/4/611.pdf, Last seen 05/04/2017.
21. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/91/13687.pdf, Last seen 24/03/2016.
22. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pr=71&code=mwp&p1=3&p2=4&p3=6, Last seen 22/04/2017.
23. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/irrc_863_cottier.pdf, Last seen;03/04/ 2016.
26. http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33 _GC -IV-EN.pdf. Last seen; 08/04/2016.
27. http://www.un.org/en/sc/ctc/docs/conventions/Conv4.pdf, Last Seen 29/03/2016.
28. http://www.unhcr.org/4963237716.pdf, Last Seen; 01/04/2016.
29. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/150-110019?OpenDocument Last seen; 08/04/2016.
33. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/customary-international-humanitarian- law -i-icrc-eng.pdf Last seen; 25/04/2016.
34. https://www.icrc.org/eng/ assets/files/ other/customary-international-humanitarian- law-ii-icrc-eng.pdf .Last seen;28/04/2016.
35. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf, Last seen 22/04/2017.
36. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf. Last seen; 27/04/2016.
37. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf, Last seen; 01/04/2016.
38. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/usdocs/hruscomments2.html, Last seen; 02/04/2017.
39. Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (1996). Report on Guatemala, para. 54.
40. Kalidhass, P. R. (2014). Determining the Status of Private Military Companies under International Law: A Quest to Solve Accountability Issues in Armed Conflicts, Amsterdam Law Forum 2014. Review 08/09/2016. Available at http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/viewFile/337/505.
41. Langille, H. Peter (2007). "Preparing for a UN Emergency Peace Service", Available at http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/09282.pdf, last seen 11/05/2016 Joana Abrisketa " Blackwater: Mercenaries and International Law", University of Deusto Law Review, October.
42. Melzer, Nils (2009). "Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law", International Committee of the Red Cross Review.
43. Michael, Cottier (2006). "Elements for Contracting and Regulating Private security and Military Companies", International  Review Red Cross,Vol. 88 No. 863, September.
44. Ortiz, Juan Carlos (2010). Private Armed Forces and Global Security: A Guide to the Issues: A Guide to the Issues, Praeger Publishing, Santa Barbara, CA the USA.
45. Sandoz, Yves, Christophe Swinarski and Bruno Zimmermann (1987). Commentary on the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, ICRC, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva.
46. Schwartz, Moshe and Joyprada Swain (2011). "Department of Defense Contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq: Background and Analysis", Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress, Congressional Research Service, May 13.
47. Singer, Peter (2003). Corporate Warriors; The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Ithaca and London), Cornell University Press.
48. Small, Michelle (2006). Privatization of Security and Military Functions and the Demise of the Modern Nation-State in Africa, Occasional Paper Series: The African Centre for the Constructive, Resolution of Disputes (Accord), Vol. 1, No. 2.
49. Urquhart, Brian, For a UN Volunteer Military Force http://www.nybooks.com/ articles/1993/06/10/for-a-un-volunteer-military-force.