Theoretical Foundations and Methods of Parliamentarians’ Performance Monitoring

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

This paper explores theoretical foundations and methods of parliamentarians’ performance monitoring comparatively. Combating political corruption, enhancing accountability and the rule of law as a basis of monitoring are discussed in the first part of the paper. In the second part, monitors parliamentarians conducts via rules of conduct as part of the internal control system has been studied and its differences with other types of regulatory rules mentioned. In the following, rules of conduct principles such as honesty and truthfulness, priority of public interests over personal interests, independence, non-discrimination, transparency and so have been discussed. Finally, the most common methods of monitoring, external and internal monitoring bodies, sanctions of violating rules of conduct and its impact upon parliamentary immunity of the representatives have been studied.

Keywords


  1. ارسطو (1371). سیاست، ترجمه حمید عنایت، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
  2. بیتام، دیوید (1390). «پارلمان پاسخ‌گو و دمکراسی در قرن بیست‌و‌یکم»، ترجمه حسن وکیلیان، تهران، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، شماره مسلسل 10738.
  3. راسخ، محمد (1388). نظارت و تعادل در نظام حقوق اساسی، تهران، انتشارات دراک.
  4. مرکز مالمیری، احمد (1385). حاکمیت قانون: مبانی و برداشت‌ها، تهران، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
  5. نورتون، فیلیپ (1390). «پارلمان در یک نگاه» در گفتارهایی در قانون و قانونگذاری (مجموعه مقالات)، تألیف و ترجمه حسن وکیلیان، تهران، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
    1. Beetham, D. (2006). Parliament and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century: A Guide to Good Practice, Inter-parliamentary Union.
    2. Callahan, K. (2007). Elements of Effective Governance, London, Tylor and Francis Group.
    3. Demmke, C. and et al. (2007). "Regulating Conflicts of Interest for Holders of Public Office in European Union", European Institute of Public Administration, in co-operation with the Utrecht School of Governance, The University of Helsinki and the University of Vassa.
    4. Euben, J. P. (2010). "Corruption" in Johnston, M. (ed.), Public Sector Corruption, Vol. 1, London, Sage Publication Ltd.

10. Genckaya, O. F. (2009). Conflict of Interests, Ankara, Council of Ethics for Public Services.

11. Hulst, M. V. D. (2000). The Parliamentary Mandate, Geneva, Interparliamentary Union.

12. Lindberg, S. I. (2009). Accountability: The Core Concept and its Subtypes, Working Paper, No. 1, Available Online at: www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/ Outputs/APPP/APPP-WP1.pdf.

13. Pelizzo, R., D. Olson and R. Stepenhurst (2004). "Trends in Parliamentary Oversight: Proceedings From a Panel at 2004 Southern Political Science Association Conference", Research Collection, Scholl of social science, paper 37, Available Online at: ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/37/.

14. Plizzo, R. and R. Stapenhurst (2006). "Legislative Ethics and Codes of Conduct", in R. Stapenhurst, N. Johnston and R. Plizzo (eds.), The Role of Parliament in Curbing Corruption, Washington D. C. World Bank.

15. Philip, M. (2006). "Defining Political Corruption", in M. Johnston (ed.), Public Sector Corruption, Vol. 1, London, Sage Publication Ltd.

16. Power, G. (2008). "Establishing Standards of Parliamentary Conduct: an Overview of Issues Relating to Codes of Conduct for Parliamentarians", Available Online at: http://www.pogar.org/ publications/legislature/2007/ cairo/coc/power-e.pdf.

17. Rathamarit, N. and et al. (2008). Codes of Conduct for Parliamentarians: A Comparative Study, Bankok, King Prajadhipok's Institution for UNDP: Regional Center.

18. Stepenhurst, R. and R. Pellizo (2004). Legislative Ethics and Codes of Conduct, Washington D. C., The World Bank.

19. Tamanah, B. Z. (2004). On the Rule of Law, History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

20. Thompson, D. F. and V. Individual (2010). "Institutional Corruption", in M. Johnston (ed.), Public Sector Corruption, Vol. 1, London, Sage Publication Ltd.

21. Waldron, J. (1999). Law and Disagreement, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

22. Warren, M. E. (2010). "What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy", in M. Johnston (ed.), Public Sector Corruption, Vol. 1, London, Sage Publication Ltd.

23. Whaley, J. (1999). Legislative Ethics, Legislative Research Series, Washington D. C., National Democratic Institution for International Affairs.

24. Williams, V. (2001). Parliamentary Codes of Conduct, Brussels, Dick Toornstra.