A Comparative Study of Countering Fake News during Election Periods and the Role the Iranian Legal System Plays

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Law, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord

2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran

Abstract

The legal approach countries employ to counter fake news at election times varies. In order to tackle this phenomenon, some countries have a general criminal and civil code. This is mainly due the absence of a law explicitly prohibiting fake news published on social media at election times. In some countries, election laws refer to a ban on broadcasting fake news, but other countries focus on fake news, and relay them on social media or websites. According to the Iranian General Election Policy, the destruction of candidates is illegal. Furthermore, under the label of defamation and spreading disinformation, criminal law has been used to tackle fake news in both parliamentary and presidential elections. Therefore using false headlines or statements in election campaigns or causing election disruption can be investigated. However, given the importance and impact of news on the fate of elections, it is necessary, especially in the case of online news sites or social media, which now play an increasingly greater role in elections, to broaden legal provisions in order to amend electoral laws or to enact special laws to counter fake news during the entire election process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. ریخته‌گر برنجی، ریحانه و کدخدایی عباسعلی (1397). «رویکرد حقوق بین‌الملل در خصوص تبلیغات خصمانه برای جنگ (پروپاگاندا)»، مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 48، ش 3.
  2. سودمندی، عبدالمجید و بهرام مستقیمی قمی (1390). «افترا و ممنوعیت آن در نظام حقوق بشر»، پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 15، ش 1.
  3. شرقی، مرضیه و پرویز عامری (1398).«مسئولیت مدنی ناشی از افترا در نظام حقوقی کامن‌لا با رویکرد تطبیقی در حقوق ایران»، پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، سال 23، ش 2.
  4. ماهنامه پیوست (1398). «نظام حقوقی ایران برای برخورد با اخبار جعلی چه ظرفیت‌ها و چه کمبودهایی دارد؟»، ش 87.
  5. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی (1389). قانون انتخابات فرانسه، ترجمه محمدهادی راجی، دفتر مطالعات سیاسی.
  6. Alaphilippe, Alexandre, Alexis Gizikis, Clara Hanot and Kalina Bontcheva (2019). Automated Tackling of Disinformation, Brussels, European Parliamentary Research Service.
  7. 7. Baade, Bjornstjern (2018). "Fake News and International Law", European Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, Issue. 4.
  1. Bradshaw ,Samantha and Philip N. Howard (2018). "Challenging Truth and Trust: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation", London, University of Oxford.
  2. Butler, Andrea (2018)."Protecting the Democratic Role of the Press: A Legal Solution to Fake News",Washington University Law Review ,Vol. 96, No. 2.
  3. Calcara, Giulio, Peter Sund and Matti Tolvanen (2019). Cybercrime, Law and Technology in Finland and Beyond, Reports of the Police University College of Finland 133/2019, PunaMusta Oy: Police University College of Finland.
  4. Calvert, Clay and Austin Vining (2018)."Filtering Fake News Through a Lens of Supreme Court Observations and Adages", First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 16.
  5. Civitella, Mark (2019)."Fake News and Facing the Wrong Way: Why the Focus on Truth is Distorting Understanding in Political Communication", Paper Presented to International Conference on Fake News and Elections in Asia, Bangkok, available at: https://asiacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Complete-Fake-News Proceedings.pdf.
  6. Council of Europe (2003). Defamation and Freedom of Expression (Selected Documents), available at: http://www.coe.int/T/E/Human_Rights/media/.
  7. Croskery, Emma (2019). "A Principled Approach to Defamation Claims in New Zealand: Untangling the Harm Threshold", Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 2.
  8. Dutta, Mohan J. (2017)."We Need Ethics, Not Regulation, to Counter Fake News", available at: https://thewire.in/137089/fake-news-communication-ethics/.
  9. Edmond, Jack (2018). "Potential Responses to the Threat of "Fake News" in a Digitalised Media Environment", A Dissertation in Partial Fulfilment of the Degree of Bachelor of Laws (with Honours) at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  10. Faiola, Anthony and Stephanie Kirchner (2017). "How do You Stop Fake News? In Germany, With a Law", The Washington Post, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/how-do-you-stop-fake-news-in -germany-with-a-law/2017/04/05/e6834ad6-1a08-11e7-bcc2.
  11. Farkas, Johan and Jannic Schou (2018)."Fake News as a Floating Signifier: Hegemony, Antagonism and the Politics of Falsehood", Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, Vol. 25, Issue. 3.
  12. Forrest, Ed and Yong Cao (2010)."Social Media: Opinions, Recommendations and Endorsements: The New Regulatory Framework for Social Media", Journal of Business and Policy Research, Vol. 5, No. 2.
  13. Fox, Jo (2020)."Fake News The Perfect Storm: Historical Perspective", Historical Research , Vol. 19, Issue. 259.
  14. Freiwald, Susan (2001). " Comparative Institutional Analysis in Cyberspace: The Case of Intermediary Liability for Defamation", Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 14.
  15. Gelfert, Axel (2018)."Fake News: A Definition", Informal Logic Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1.
  16. Griffen, Scott (2017). Defamation and Insult Laws in the OSCE Region: A Comparative Study, Austria: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
  17. Hasen, Richard L. (2013)."A Constitutional Right to Lie in Campaigns and Elections?", Montana Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 1.
  18. House of Commons (2018). Disinformation and "Fake News": Interim Report, Government Response To The Commitee’s Fifth Report oF Session 2017–19, available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1630/1630.pdf.
  19. http://farsi.khamenei.ir.
  20. http://www.flevin.com.
  21. https://afjc.af.
  22. https://dictionary.cambridge.org.
  23. https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org.
  24. https://laws.justice.gc.ca.
  25. https://press.farhang.gov.ir.
  26. https://rc.majlis.ir.
  27. https://sso.agc.gov.sg.
  28. https://www.shora-gc.ir.
  29. Jamnejad, Maziar and Michael Wood (2009). "The Principle of Non-Intervention", Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, Issue. 2.
  30. Katsirea, Irini (2018)."Fake News: Reconsidering the Value of Untruthful Expression in the Face of Regulatory Uncertainty", Journal of Media Law, Vol. 10, No. 2.
  31. Klein, David and Jushua Wueller (2017)."Fake News: A Legal Perspective", Journal of Internet Law, Vol. 20, No. 10.
  32. LeRoy Miller, Roger (2011). Business Law Today, The Essentials, United States, South-Western College.
  33. Livingstone, Sonia (2004)."Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies", The Communication Review, Vol. 7, No. 1.
  34. Moran, Michael T. (2018)."Criminal Defamation and Public Insult Law in the Republic of Poland: The Curtailing of Freedom of Expression", Michigan State International Law Review, Vol. 26.
  35. OAS (2019)."Guide to Guarantee Freedom of Expression Regarding Deliberate Disinformation in Electoral Contexts",available at:https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/publications/Guia_Desinformacion_VF%20ENG.pdf.
  36. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe(OSCE((2017)."Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and "Fake News", Disinformation and Propaganda", available at: https://www.osce.org/fom/302796.
  37. Park, Ahran and Kyo Ho Youm (2019). "Fake News from a Legal Perspective: The United States and South Korea Compared", Southwestern Journal of International Law, Vol. 25, No. 1.
  38. Santuraki, Suleiman (2019)."Trends in the Regulation of Hate Speech and Fake News: A Threat to Free Speech?", Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2.
  39. Timmer, Joe (2017)."Fighting Falsity: Fake News, Facebook and the First Amendment", Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 35.
  40. Wardle, Claire and Hossein Derakhshan (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Inter Disciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
  41. www.gesetze-iminternet.de.
  42. www.legislation.gov.uk.
  43. www.merriam-webster.com.
  44. Zeng, Jing, Chung-hong Chan and King-wa Fu (2017)."How Social Media Construct "Truth" Around Crisis Events: Weibo’s Rumor Management Strategies after the 2015 Tianjin Blasts", Policy and Internet Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics